Bible translation that is:

  1. modern English
  2. very literal (formal equivalence / word-for-word translation)
  3. based on the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament
pros (favorable factors)cons (unfavorable factors)users
LSB (2021) (is a revision of the NASB 1995)
https://lsbible.org
https://316publishing.com/collections/lsb
https://www.knygos.lt/lt/knygos/autorius/steadfast-bibles/
extremely literal; modern English; “slave“; “man““Yahweh“; not popular; no audioJohn MacArthur
NASB 1995very literalslighty dated EnglishJohn MacArthur; Jordan Riley;
NASB 2020
https://www.amazon.com/nasb
literal; 2020 more modern English than 1995inclusive language (“person“, “brothers and sisters“, “bond-servant“)biblegateway.com; Molly Ann Luna;
ESV (2001; 2007; 2011; 2016; 2025) (is a conservative revision of the 1971 RSV)
https://www.esv.org
https://www.crossway.org/bibles
essentially literal; contemporary not casual English; the most widely used literal + readable translationgotquestions.org; ItsGabby
RSV (1952; 1971) (is a revision of the ASV)
NET (2005)contemporary English; moderately high literal (leans literal but prioritizes clarity); footnotes for textual criticism

Other translations:

pros (favorable factors)cons (unfavorable factors)users
ASV (1901) (is a revision of the RV)the most word-for-word English translation of its era / the most literal old-school English Bible;
public domain
archaic language
RV (1881-1885) (is a revision of the KJV)more literal than KJV, NKJVarchaic language
NKJV (1982)very popularbased on textus receptus, not Nestle-Aland;
less literal than RV, ASV
Vlad Savchuk; Ray Comfort; Jackie Veritas; Lloyd Chin; Andi Haddock;
KJV (1611; 1769)very popular;
public domain
archaic languageBryan Denlinger; Chris LaSala; Kelly Nicholson; Rachel Moses; Steven Anderson;
NRSVue (2022) (is a revision of the NRSV)inclusive language (pro gay)
NRSV (1982) (is a liberal revision of the 1971 RSV)
inclusive language (pro gay)
TLV (2015)hebrew namesLea;
CSB (2017) (is a revision of the 2004 HCSB)more formal than NIVnot literal / “optimal equivalance“ philosophy;
more dynamic than ESV
AMP (1987; 2015)with explanations
NIV (1978; 1984; 2011)very popular;not literal at all / “dynamic equivalence“;
ERV (1987; 2006; 2015) (is a successor of the EVD)easy to readRachel Moses?;
NLT (1996; 2004; 2007; 2013; 2015)Roman Savochka;

Related:

Biblija su komentarais
https://dzodis.com/2025/09/13/biblija-su-komentarais/

Textus Receptus vs Nestle-Aland
https://dzodis.com/2025/07/09/textus-receptus-vs-nestle-aland/